• From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 14:01:05 -0000

Marcelo Cantos wrote:
> (I haven't really given it
> that much thought), but the above is definitely wrong IMO.

Thanks for your contribution Marcelo. I can feel the frontiers of
knowledge being pushed back.

My problem is I waste so much time thinking things through, and then
carefully penning responses to see if I can contribute to the debate,
when really I should just toss a coin. I could then reply "I haven't
thought about this, but it's wrong (because it's heads) or it's right
(because it's tails)."

Thanks again Marcelo, I now have more time for roller-blading and my
philately interests.

Mark


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
    • From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal
• Next by Date: RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Previous by thread: Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Next by thread: Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread