• From: keshlam@u...
• To: xml-dev-digest@i...
• Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 12:58:55 -0500

>It is a little contradictory that
>DOM uses IDL, and hence is useful for networked access to tree objects,


The DOM uses IDL strictly as a language-independent way of describing the
spec. That should not be taken as a promise that all, or even most DOM API
implementations will be network-accessible.

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Parser with DOM in C
• Next by thread: Re: XDK
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread