[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
  • To: "'Nigel Hutchison'" <nwoh@s...>, "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 17:38:53 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Nigel Hutchison [SMTP:nwoh@s...]
> 
	[snip]
> Then a server could project its own GUI api and leave it to the client
> side
> to choose C++, Java etc to build the interface at run time.  I suspect
> that
> in most cases the bandwidth required to shift the XML GUI description
> would
> be quite a bit less than the 
> compiled java classes. If this is so than "Even Cooler" would be XML GUI
> interpreter built into a Internet Browser.
> 
> But am I running too far with this one?
> 
	Not at all - that's exactly the aim of XUL, part of the Mozilla
project. I suspect that once mozilla is stable and released we are going to
see some really awsome GUI's built using XUL. As a proof of concept, the UI
for mozilla is now built using XUL.

	Matt.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member