• From: keshlam@u...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:35:37 -0500

Personal opinion: The right way out of the "never-ending document" problem
is to declare that the stream is a stream of transaction documents, NOT a
single huge document in its own right.

Not everything that can (theoretically) be an XML document should be. Some
should be fragments, some should be aggregations.

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD)
• Next by Date: RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Previous by thread: RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments
• Next by thread: RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread