Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 12:42 PM 2/24/99 -0800, Tom Harding wrote: >David Megginson wrote: > >> 1. Use a non-XML mechanism for separating XML packets -- that way, >> there's not a tight dependency between the stream-handler and the >> parser (the stream handler knows the bounds of each packet without >> doing any XML parsing). > >What bit sequence would you use as a separator and how would you ensure >that no conceivable encoding would produce it spuriously? This may be going out on a limb, but what about: 200 OK HTTP/1.1 Content-type: text/xml Content-length: ... Nah, it'll never work. wunder -- Walter R. Underwood wunder@i... wunder@b... (home) http://software.infoseek.com/cce/ (my product) http://www.best.com/~wunder/ 1-408-543-6946 xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
