• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• To: "Chris Olds" <colds@n...>, "Richard Tobin" <richard@c...>, "Philip J Grabner" <grabner@i...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 00:43:40 GMT

> Actually, it's already a syntax error - Section 4.3.2 says that "An internal
> parsed general entity is well-formed if its replacement text matches
> <i>content</i>."

Actually that's not quite right.  The parsed entity is not
well-formed, but that doesn't affect the well-formedness of the
document unless the entity is referenced (section 2.1).

>  Do any of the available parsers indicate an error if &elt;
> is not used in the document?

Yes - the STG validator at http://www.stg.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/

-- Richard

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: parsing entity values
    • From: Richard Goerwitz <richard@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Understanding RDF
• Next by Date: Re: parsing entity values
• Previous by thread: Re: parsing entity values
• Next by thread: Re: parsing entity values
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread