• From: David LeBlanc <whisper@a...>
• To: "ML XMLDev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 23:45:24 -0800

(standing well away from the opening as he opens Pandora's box)

Is there any group working or thinking about an XML 2.0 spec? Is XMLDev an
appropriate place to talk about such a thing?

Reading "Structuring XML" by David Megginson, I keep seeing things
mentioned that are in SGML that I wonder why they got left out of XML. They
don't appear to add undesired complexity to things and they do look like
they would add to the power and flexibility of the notation.

At a minimum, a couple of things i'd like to see are CDATA element content
and CDATA attribute content.

Dave LeBlanc

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML - NG
    • From: Steve DeRose <Steven_DeRose@B...>
  • Re: XML - NG
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: How 2 output tags att with XSL
• Next by Date: Re: XML - NG
• Previous by thread: How 2 output tags att with XSL
• Next by thread: Re: XML - NG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread