• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 10:09:08 -0600

Dave Winer wrote:
> 
> We already have this. I hate it when people say things like "No one has a
> good,
> scalable solution for this now." We do. Are you supposed to be an expert on
> this stuff or do you just like to hear yourself talk?

Before I waste (er invest) my time, let's be clear. How high does this
solution scale? My customers have XML data on various scales:
50MB, 500 MB, 4GB and 4 terabytes. To which customers should I promote the
Frontier database?

 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Don't you know that the smart bombs are so clever, they only kill 
bad people."
	- http://www.boingo.com/lyrics/WarAgain.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• References:
  • Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
    • From: Ed Howland <Ed@d...>
  • Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Another errata?
• Next by Date: Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
• Next by thread: Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread