• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:36:51 -0800

At 03:27 PM 1/29/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>In general, few high-speed, large-scale applications can afford
>repeated passes through serial text files (or even random access
>through reverse indices), so using XML (in the literal sense) for
>primary storage is impractical; there are, of course, exceptions --
>for example, small bits of XML can be stored as blobs in relational
>databases.

Well, I'm not sure.  Perhaps it's just because my perceptions were
formed by working on the 500-MB deeply recursive Oxford English
Dictionary text; but I think that a high-performance repository
that could accurately mimic the data structures observed in XML
would very useful in many (not all, obviously) applications.  I 
think I hear both Megginson and Winer expressing doubt on that 
front.  I'm surprised.  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is XML for?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: What is XML for?
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What is XML for?
• Next by Date: Re: What is XML for?
• Previous by thread: Re: Spitting out XML (was RE: Will XML eat the web?)
• Next by thread: Re: What is XML for?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread