Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Megginson wrote: > > Why would you be disappointed if you were following best practice? > This is *exactly* the right way to use XML, at least in the data > world. XML is designed to be an exchange format that allows different > systems to talk to each other; it does not dictate how those systems > should deal with the information internally. I've noticed a very unfortunate trend among my customers. They want to replace relational databases with XML. They want to replace purpose-built query languages with XSL. They want to replace object models and UML with DTDs and "XML Schemas". People are also talking about using the DOM as the interface to data of all sorts. This trend is very worrisome and will likely lead to a backlash against XML. I'm working in the opposite direction. I wonder: * Isn't OQL pretty close to an XML query language? * Aren't STEP and ODL pretty close to being XML object model schema languages? * Wouldn't it be nice to have more formal mechanisms for characterizing languages (like XQL, XPointer, URLs, JavaScript) that do NOT use angle-bracket syntax? Another worrisome trend is that people creating the XML standards would rather invent rather than learn about things that already exist. "NI@theW3C" syndrome? Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Don't you know that the smart bombs are so clever, they only kill bad people." - http://www.boingo.com/lyrics/WarAgain.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
