• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "Lars Marius Garshol" <larsga@i...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:50:54 -0500

>I don't mean to sounds dismissive, but I think it's so important to
>get SAX 2.0 right that the implications for MDSAX and ParserFilter
>should IMHO be completely disregarded.


Agreed. I'll admidt that, since MDSAX is still being finalized, I've been
looking at the short-term compatibility issues. If we get it right, MDSAX
could be a lot of fun. And at this point, I think we are very very close.

Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX: Next Round
• Next by Date: Fw: SAX: Next Round
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: Next Round
• Next by thread: Fw: SAX: Next Round
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread