• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 11:31:30 -0800

At 09:43 AM 1/15/99 -0500, Borden, Jonathan wrote:
>This is the *current* state of affairs. There are people who also believe
>that in the future the namespace concept is to be extended to incorporate
>Schema definition. That is, when a namespace URN points to a Schema
>definition, the Schema may, can or will be enforced in the same way that a
>DTD is enforced by a validating parser and a <!DOCTYPE definition.

Other way around.  There are people (most people who follow this
stuff) who think that a future schema facility needs to be 
namespace-sensitive.  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: What is a namespace ... really?
    • From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is a namespace ... really?
• Next by Date: RE: What is a namespace ... really?
• Previous by thread: RE: What is a namespace ... really?
• Next by thread: RE: What is a namespace ... really?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread