• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 17:23:03 -0500

Andrew Layman wrote:
 
> If I understand this, the author is saying that the kinds of mappings
> achievable with architectural forms can also be achieved with XSL.  Is that
> correct?

Tentatively yes.  I have not made an exhaustive comparison, but
I believe that an XSL stylesheet can do everything XAF at least
can do (which is a subset of full architectural forms processing,
notably because XAF has no concept of an architectural DTD).

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Compound DTDs
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespaces hate validation!
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces hate validation!
• Previous by thread: RE: Compound DTDs
• Next by thread: Architectural forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread