• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 06:51:34 -0800

>>In brief, then, XML is a very sophisticated exchange (import/export)
format, and RDBMs are very sophisticated storage and retrieval tools.
Different species, but they can be taught to play together nicely.

Excellent! That's exactly right, and I'd add..

XML opens the door for other kinds of storage systems that are more suited
to the hierarchies that can be represented in XML but are awkward in the
relational model.

Dave

-----------------------------
http://www.scriptingnews.com/


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: "Dan Holle" <dan@h...>
  • Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
    • From: <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: sub-documents
• Next by Date: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread