• From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• To: "'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 12:40:10 +0100

Dave LeBlanc wrote:

> I would *really* like to know what are considered the more subtle parts 
of
> XML - seriously!

Entities.

Not the simple include-this-file or substitute-this-text-kind, but the 
I'm-going-to-exploit-every-possibility-and-combination-I-can-find kind.  In 
other words, anything where you need to read section 4.4 to figure it out. 
 Subtle, devious, frustrating.  Pick the pejorative of your choice.

-- Ron


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Is XML for the peons or the gods? (was What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
• Previous by thread: Re: What is XML for?
• Next by thread: CML and the MML of XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread