• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 18:00:46 -0600

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> I'm saying: I want a database that can do XML, by which I mean infinite
> levels of attributed nested sequenced constructs.  

Please don't stop there! Like many of our "tools vendors" you've forgotten
about (or chosen not to support) links. My worry about non-OO technologies
is that I wonder how they support links (and queries on links) and RDF
(and queries on RDF models) and topic maps (and queries on topic
relationships). I suppose you could represent all of these as relations in
a relational database. I just hope that these "other groups" are planning
to deal with these issues instead of pretending that XML documents don't
have links (which is what most current vendors do).

 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Don't you know that the smart bombs are so clever, they only kill 
bad people."
	- http://www.boingo.com/lyrics/WarAgain.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: What is XML for?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XML for the peons or the gods? (was What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
• Previous by thread: Re: What is XML for?
• Next by thread: Re: What is XML for?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread