• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Dave Winer <dave@u...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 09:16:26 -0800

At 06:47 AM 1/30/99 -0800, Dave Winer wrote:
>We already have this. I hate it when people say things like "No one has a
>good,
>scalable solution for this now." We do. Are you supposed to be an expert on
>this stuff or do you just like to hear yourself talk?

Just to be specific; are you claiming that I can pump a terabyte or
so of densely structured XML text with mixed content and so on, into
Frontier, without having to do all sorts of hand-mapping elements and
attributes to native data structures, and then handle many complex-search 
transactions and a few granular-update transactions per second?

Just to make it clear, if Frontier *can* do this, it's the only piece
of software in the world that can. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Repositories: From Argument to Architecture
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
    • From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Re: Another errata?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
• Next by thread: Re: Is XML dead already or what? Was: RE: What is XML for?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread