• From: <david@m...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:11:17 -0500 (EST)

John Cowan writes:

 > This is already true of the SAX attribute map, as the SAX
 > documentation warns; in fact, parsers are free to reuse the same
 > object for *every* attribute map.

In most cases, they probably _should_ do that to avoid unnecessary
allocation.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Next Round
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
  • Re: Next Round
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
  • Re: Next Round
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
  • Re: Next Round
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Next Round
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: Next Round
• Previous by thread: Re: Next Round
• Next by thread: interned names [Re: Next Round]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread