• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:56:04 -0500

At 09:13 AM 1/15/99 -0600, Paul Prescod wrote:
>There are going to
>be many places in the Web information system where ASCII and Unicode are
>used without XML. The most reasonable way to handle this would be to allow
>mime types to have arbitrary levels.

Of course plain text will still survive; I'm hardly proposing abolishing
text or application as top-level types.  I'm just saying that XML is a
top-level type itself. 

Your arbitrary level proposal is quite reasonable, though I suspect that
that would require considerably more development (through the full IETF
process) than just adding a new top-level type.

Intriguing possibility, though...

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Cookies
Sharing Bandwidth 
Building XML Applications (March)
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML media types revisited
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • RE: XML media types revisited
    • From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • XML media types revisited
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XML media types revisited
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML media types revisited
• Next by Date: RE: What is a namespace ... really?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML media types revisited
• Next by thread: RE: XML media types revisited
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread