• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 14:14:21 -0500

Bryan Cooper wrote:

> That is, can we declare an ENTITY that contains a PI?

Sure, why not?  A parsed entity can have anything that matches
the Content[43] rule (after entity references have been expanded,
in the case of an internal parsed entity), and Content[43]
allows elements, character data, references, CDATA sections,
PIs, and comments.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Default Namespace should be clearly documented ...
    • From: Bryan Cooper <bryan.cooper@v...>

• References:
  • Re: Default Namespace should be clearly documented ...
    • From: Bryan Cooper <bryan.cooper@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XLink/XPointer Developer's List
• Next by Date: SAX and delayed entity loading
• Previous by thread: Re: Default Namespace should be clearly documented ...
• Next by thread: Re: Default Namespace should be clearly documented ...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread