• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 16:05:54 -0500

Chris von See scripsit:

> In section 4.3.3, the XML spec implies
> that support of ISO 10646 UCS-2 encoding (i.e. Unicode)

Unicode = UTF-16, not UCS-2.  In practice there is no difference
at the moment, because no 10646 planes other than the BMP (plane 0)
contain any characters.  UTF-16 = Unicode uses surrogate
characters, whereas UCS-2 simply cannot represent the Astral Planes.
Therefore, UTF-16 encoding should be used instead of UCS-2.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Character encodings
    • From: Chris von See <cvonsee@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character encodings
• Next by Date: Expat and line breaks
• Previous by thread: Re: Character encodings
• Next by thread: Re: Character encodings
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread