• From: "Gabe Beged-Dov" <begeddov@j...>
• To: "Gabe Beged-Dov" <begeddov@j...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 08:30:02 -0800

In looking back through the xml-dev archives I see alot of threads that have
touched on the area of using MIME like tags/attributes for handling binary
content. Most of the discussion was relative to inlining binary content
rather than linking.

One distinction between most of these threads and this one was that I
propose that we use the mime nomenclature and semantics as directly as
possible (via the mime namespace) rather than mimicing them in xml via
things like xml:content-type and xml:packing.

The two mime names that are needed for inline binary entities are
"mime:Content-type" and "mime:Content-transfer-encoding". The latter can
only use the "base64" encoding for binary data as "7bit" and "8bit" clash
with XML.

If we can agree on a URI for the mime namespace, we could potentially start
merrily transferring binary content inline in our XML documents. OK, so I'm
a naive wild-eyed optimist :-).

~gabe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Are there any XML DOM tree to HTML DOM tree converters?
• Next by Date: Re: Serializations and data structures (was Re: Topic MapsonSQL)
• Previous by thread: Re: MIME namespace...
• Next by thread: Re: MIME namespace...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread