• From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 20:08:23 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Joel Bender wrote:

[...]
> I've been adding something like this
> to my XML documents:
> 	<prop name="state" xml:regexp="[A-Z]+">NY</prop>

Note that the xml prefix is reserved, so this is not really kosher.
It's not actually an error, as the spec nowhere says what "reserved" means.

[...]
> Works OK for content, but I don't see how I can add this meta-meta-data for
> attributes.

You could do xml:content="name ~ /pattern/, ~ /pattern/" I suppose.

But a schema would be better.

Lee

-- 
Liam Quin, GroveWare Inc., Toronto;  The barefoot agitator
l i a m q u i n     at    i n t e r l o g    dot   c o m


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?
    • From: Joel Bender <joel@s...>

• Prev by Date: XLink/XPointer Developer's List, how to subscribe
• Next by Date: Re: Publication of W3C XML Fragment WG Requirements document
• Previous by thread: Re: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?
• Next by thread: Re: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread