• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 10:24:32 -0600

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> Because I thought XML (and Unicode) were in the business of enabling,
> not constraining.  

XML DTDs are in the business of constraining people to the data models and
data that the software is expecting/can deal with. I don't see any big
difference between saying: "This content must be restricted to this set of
characters" and "this content must be a NMTOKEN or base-64 encoded."

Nevertheless, this is clearly a schema problem and CDATA sections seem to
me to be a really bad tool for enforcing this distinction. No editor
vendor is going to support that use for them so it is a moot point.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights will be 50 years old on
December 10, 1998. These are your fundamental rights:
http://www.udhr.org/history/default.htm

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Updated: Scripting News in XML
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
  • Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• References:
  • RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
  • Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml parser
• Next by Date: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Previous by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread