• From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• To: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@b...>
• Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 11:03:54 -0800

Paul Spencer wrote:
> 
> Mind you, I don't think MS is correctly implementing the August 18
> [XSL] draft, but that is another matter, and I could be wrong.

With "xsl:eval", "xsl:script" and many other proprietary extensions,
yet without even "xsl:process-children", I think you're clearly right.
W3C's XSL pattern syntax is there, but not a lot else.

This would have been a good time to use the namespace mechanism, for
example "msxsl:" for those extensions, and "xsl:" for W3C features.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and IE5 beta PR2
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• References:
  • Re: XML and IE5 beta PR2
    • From: "Paul Spencer" <paul.spencer@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re[2]: IE50 - XML Examples
• Next by Date: Commercial XML Parser in C++
• Previous by thread: Re: XML and IE5 beta PR2
• Next by thread: Re: XML and IE5 beta PR2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread