• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 10:32:28 -0500

Borden, Jonathan wrote:

> Alternatively, you can expose both CDATA as an element of type CDATA and as
> text within the TEXT element. This would preserve the intended behavior
> w.r.t. text as well as allowing the option of iterating over CDATA elements
> for interested parties.

Actually, the only thing you can do with a Text node that you can't
do with a CDATA node is merge it with an adjacent Text node, a very
minor capability which can easily be simulated.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by Date: DTD,s
• Previous by thread: RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread