• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 12:11:21 -0500

Lauren Wood replied to me:

> > The DOM has a ProcessingInstruction node, though pseudo-attribute parsing
> > is not performed.
> 
> This would be a possibility, but this reading of the content of a PI
> isn't in the XML spec, so the DOM WG didn't want to add
> semantics that weren't in the spec. So we stuck to the simple
> target+data approach, at least for Level 1.

In the words of Hyman Kaplan:  "I described.  I did not condemn."

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by Date: RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Previous by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread