• From: <david@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 07:00:04 -0500 (EST)

Rick Jelliffe writes:

 > A CDATA marked section is not only a way to prevent delimiter
 > recognition.  It is also a way to declare that the characters in
 > that section are limited to ones available in the direct document
 > encoding of the originating system.  (SGML has a CDATA keyword you
 > can use instead of content models: XML was felt not to need it
 > because you could use <![CDATA[, however that perhaps shows the
 > mind of the XML WG at that time, in that they were down-playing the
 > need for schemas.) It declares "this section does not use character
 > references or entities or subelements". So, conceptually, it could
 > sometimes be markup, not merely delimiter recognition.

While I agree that there are always interesting new uses for markup
constructions, I think that we're straining here.  My basic rule in
system design is to keep things as simple and obvious as possible; if
I wanted to signal to my application that an element contained only a
certain type of information (such as a limited character repetoire), I
would use an attribute that made that point clear, either a NOTATION
attribute or a simple CDATA attribute named something like
"character-encoding".

That said, I don't see the usefulness of limiting content to a
specific character repetoire arbitrarily; I *do* see the usefulness in
combination with an "xml:lang" or "mime-type" attribute, though.  An
intelligent editor could already act on xml:lang to limit character
selection, if such a thing were desirable.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• References:
  • Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
  • RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by Date: XML in IE5 beta PR2
• Previous by thread: RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by thread: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread