• From: Chris Lovett <clovett@m...>
• To: 'Rick Jelliffe' <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 09:39:15 -0800

I like Rick's idea of xml:content-mode="CDATA".  This definitely
disambiguates this whitespace case for the validating parser.

So 
  <!DOCTYPE a [
    <!ELEMENT a (b, c)>
    <!ELEMENT b EMPTY>
    <!ELEMENT c EMPTY>
  ]>
  <a><![CDATA[  ]]><b/><c/></a>

would become:

  <!DOCTYPE a [
    <!ELEMENT a (b, c)>
    <!ATTLIST a xml:content-mode CDATA #FIXED "CDATA">
    <!ELEMENT b EMPTY>
    <!ELEMENT c EMPTY>
  ]>
  <a>  <b/><c/></a>

It's true that a non-validating parser will have difficulty with the latter
example, but that is solved by putting the xml:content-mode attribute on the
instance.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
• Next by Date: Re: xml parser
• Previous by thread: Updated: Scripting News in XML
• Next by thread: Re: Optional Nodes in the DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread