• From: Michael Ax <ax@h...>
• To: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 03:03:08 -0700

Hi Don, thanks for trying, but I don't think you're really speaking to my
questions here!

>1. Using XML just for describing the structure of the data makes no sense
>because you can not use generic XML tools to process the data.

hence my observations re filters and oo file systems.


>2. Compression reduces file size difference to 10%-30%.

3rd nf reduces log files by 16:1 without compression.


>3. Cost of 10 Gig drives will be considerablly less by the time server
>vendors stop supporting legacy log formats.

n* 4++ will still be far more


>4. Due to the Y2K problem, concerns for compactness is equated with
>shortsightedness these days.

by whom?


-
Cheers,
Michael


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Web server logs in XML?
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Web server logs in XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Ownership of Names
• Previous by thread: Re: Web server logs in XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Web server logs in XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread