Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I like XObjects. XObjects IS what we are doing. Its like CLOS - common lisp
object system.
Does that mean we could have XOS - XML Object System ! SOX backwards makes
it all a little confusing I fear. :)
anyway interfaces.........
> public interface Bindings
> {
> public org.w3c.dom.Document
> convert(org.xml.sax.InputSource inputSource)
> throws SAXException;
> }
i think the above is at the right level. Is this part of a domBuilder
interface?
if so should 'convert' be 'build'
public interface domBuilder
{
public org.w3c.dom.Document
build(org.xml.sax.InputSource inputSource)
throws SAXException;
public org.w3c.dom.Document build(org.xml.sax.InputSource
inputSource, org.w3c.dom.Document mappingDOM)
throws SAXException;
etc.
}
The second prototype is an example of how generic binding types might be
specified. The mappingDOM contains information regarding the instantiation
of the DOM from the inputSource.
graham.
gdm@d...
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
