• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 02:14:59 +0800

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

>I consider it a flaw of XML that it has two ways to do hierarchy

Bear in mind that XML was designed primarily for *document* interchange. The
attribute vs element decision (which is really just a markup vs content
decision)  IMO, is a lot less clear in data-centric applications than it is
in document-centric ones. XML might have looked quite different if the
things people are doing nowadays with XML were thought up when SGML was
being developed.

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@j... / www.jtauber.com
Associate Researcher, Electronic Commerce Network
Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia

Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com,  www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Content v. attribute
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Previous by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread