• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: emberson@f... (Richard Emberson), xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 18:49:54 -0700

At 03:18 PM 10/17/98 -0700, Richard Emberson wrote:

>Now in production rule #2 titled Character Range 
>surrogate blocks are explicitly excluded (along 
>with FFFF and FFFE). 

There are no Unicode characters whose numeric values
are those which appear in the surrogate blocks; the blocks
exist only to ensure the possibility of encoding non-BMP 
characters unambiguously.  The productions in the spec
describe the characters themselves, not any particular
encoding of them.

>There are the extra, beyond 16-bit, characters specified
>by the spec in production rule #2 as "[x10000-#x10FFFF]".
>Is this how Unicode characters that use the surrogate
>blocks get represented in an XML document? 

Yes.  For example, it's legal to have 𐀁

>Short of getting a copy of the Unicode 2.0 spec, is there 
>anywhere where the conversion algorithm is documented?

I strongly recommend getting a copy of the spec.  It's fairly
priced and a very fine piece of work. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Character Range: surrogate blocks
• Next by Date: Private-Use Characters (RE: Character Range: surrogate blocks)
• Previous by thread: RE: Character Range: surrogate blocks
• Next by thread: XML usage in/for libraries
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread