• From: Thierry Thelliez <tgt@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:43:49 -0600

1- Why having yet another syntax ? I mean
-//myOrg//myDocType myDocName//en
could be:
<Registered>No</Registered>
<Org>myOrg</Org>
<DocType>myDocType</DocType>
<DocName>myDocName</DocName>
<Lang>en</Lang>

2- Where can I find more info about FPIs ? I spend a long time with
a web search engine but got only few interesting documents. Where can I
find ISO 9070 related documents ? The ISO web site is not very user friendly
for a first timer.

3- Assuming that we keep this syntax, would it be valid to have something
like:
-//anOrg::anAuthor//aDocType aDocName::aVersionNumber//en

or even worse:

-//aCountry::anOrg::aDepartment::anAuthor//aDocType::aDocTypeVersionNumber aDocName::aDocVersionNumber//en

4- There is already some code out there to help parsing XMLs (I took a Smalltalk
code and ported it to GemStone). Is there anything to parse FPIs ?
 

Regards
Thierry
 

-- 

.....................................................................
. Thierry Thelliez                   Los Alamos National Laboratory .
.   Email: tgt@l...                                      CIC-15 .
.   Voice: (505) 665 8631                                   MS M310 .
.     Fax: (505) 665 5725                       Los Alamos NM 87545 .
.     URL: http://www.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/phone/113845             USA .
.....................................................................

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: FPI questions
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REC-xml-19980210: whitespace
• Next by Date: Re: REC-xml-19980210: whitespace
• Previous by thread: ANN: DBMS -> XML -> HTML (article)
• Next by thread: RE: FPI questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread