• From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 08:48:33 +0000

Another important aspect of attributes - they can be layered
on by the parser. I.e. defaulted. XLINK and AF's in
general make use of this.

In an attribute free world we would need an element only way
of achieving the same thing.

<xlink:xlink>
	<xlink:simple>
		<xlink:etn>xref</xlink:etn>
		<xlink:etn>seealso</xlink:etn>
	</xlink:simple>
	...
</xlink:xlink>


Sean Mc Grath

def Get_URI_Of_Superlative_XML_Scripting_Language():
	return "http://www.python.org"


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Content v. attribute
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>
  • Re: Content v. attribute
    • From: Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@x...

• Prev by Date: Re: c++ parser for DOM
• Next by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Previous by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread