[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Toby Speight <tms@a...>
  • To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: 15 Oct 1998 16:49:43 +0100

Elliotte> Elliotte Rusty Harold <URL:mailto:elharo@s...>

0> In article <v0310280ab24bbe45deec@[168.100.203.234]>, Elliotte
0> wrote:

Elliotte> Is open source a solution? Maybe, especially if the DTD is
Elliotte> external to the document. However, standard open source
Elliotte> licenses like the GPL are problematic because they would
Elliotte> seem to imply that if the DTD is included with the document
Elliotte> itself, then the entire document must be open source.

IINM, this is (almost exactly) the situation that the LGPL is designed
for - your proprietary document may be linked to the open DTD and
distributed as long as the user retains the ability to link with a
different DTD.  <URL:news:gnu.misc.discuss> is probably a good place
to verify whether this is a correct interpretation for documents.

-- 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member