• From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 15:54:45 -0700

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> Well, I can say that Netscape 4.06, IE 4.01, and Lynx 2.7, all on
> Windows NT 4.0 SP3, are "XHTML-compliant" using the <BR /> trick.

The "3.0 browsers" seem a bit more sensitive; that's where some more
facts would help most.  I confess to having little sympathy for the
folk running 2.0 browsers any more.

IE 4.01 accepted "<BR/>" (no space) for me.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
  • Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: TLAs (was: SOX)
• Next by Date: Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
• Previous by thread: Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
• Next by thread: Re: Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread