Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 6:40 PM +0800 11/9/98, James Clark wrote: >How are we disagreeing? I said "specifies its result as XML" not >"specifies that its result is XML". In other words it describes its >result in terms of an XML document. That XML document doesn't have to >be created. Ah. In that case you are making more precise use of English than I'm used to parsing (too much dealing with Americans :-) and we are not disagreeing. I'm also relieved to see that my understanding and intentions are not as far off the mainstream as I thought. This has been an interesting discussion. It seems to me that there are 2, possiby 3 variations on the processing models, as perceived by different people on this list. content-only XML + XSL = 1) XML structure as internal representation (eg: c++ objects) 2) XML output formatted for markup, like non-styled HTML 3) structurally transformed XML plus a stylesheet (which may be CSS) Andy (Australianised ex-pat) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
