• From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@q...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 20:50:22 -0400

Don Park wrote:

> David,
>
> It might be a Good Thing (tm by Tyler) to setup a SAX Service Directory

Hehe...  I suppose all you would really need here is to have a web server that
indexes the JAR files (or other binary container format for other languages) of
every parser.


> Server.  This way, any SAX client can find the latest and the greatest SAX
> parser over the Net.
>

Another idea that has come to mind is moving the SAX directory structure from:

org.xml.sax

to:

org.xml.sax.parser

Things like standard output APIs may have some claim to being put in a standard
namespace like org.xml.sax  For the sake of flexibility, perhaps moving SAX to a
sub-package may be best in the long run.  SAX stands for Simple API for XML.
Right now this seems to only apply for parsers, but I think the next step may be
for formatters to be standardized as well.

Tyler


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: More SAX Parsers and Applications?
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Attributes or not Attributes ?
• Next by Date: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt
• Previous by thread: SAX Service Directory (was Re: More SAX Parsers and Applications?)
• Next by thread: Re: More SAX Parsers and Applications?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread