• From: Deke Smith <deke@t...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Sep 98 10:30:46 -0500

John Cowan, cowan@l... said on 9/23/98 10:02 AM:

>ISO-10646-UCS-2 is near enough UTF-16; UTF-16 only implies that
>surrogates are correctly processed, and decent UCS-2 implementations
>will at worst leave surrogates alone.

And what is the implications of this (if any) for XML rendering? I'm not 
sure of what you mean by "surrogates are correctly processed."

Thanks for everyone's answers. They have helped.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Deke Smith
Tallent Communications Group, Brentwood TN
deke@t..., 615-661-9878
-----------------------------------------------------------------
" The best way to predict the future is to invent it. " 
       - Alan Kay 



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Mix encodings in a document?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Corba data -> XML
• Next by Date: attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Mix encodings in a document?
• Next by thread: Re: Mix encodings in a document?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread