• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 17:31:21 -0400

matt@v... wrote:

> Are you calling for the resurrection of SHORTREFS?  Content models should
> ideally address the abstract syntax tree.  Lexical constraints address
> content.  If you want to cross them, you need something like SHORTREFS (or
> BNF).

I have called for a simple-minded kind of SHORTREF, to address the
fact that #PCDATA content has internal markup of a type-specific
kind: decimal points in numbers, colons and hyphens in dates, etc.
etc.

Coming soon: ShortRefFilter.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Proposition: "SGML is Gumming Up the Works"
• Next by Date: Re: XML is boring (long --- sorry)
• Previous by thread: Re: Proposition: "SGML is Gumming Up the Works"
• Next by thread: Tiny Point: Rewriting and Documents on readonly CD's
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread