• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 06:17:22 -0400

Chris Maden writes:

 > Support for pre-XML HTML was explicitly considered and rejected by
 > the Working Group.

Absolutely correct.

Since HTML <= 4.0 is *not* XML, it is best to treat it as an output
format, like PDF, TeX, RDF, Postscript, etc. -- in other words, first
produce your XML, then run it through a filter (such as a SAX-based
app) that does a down-translation to HTML syntax.  If the XML document
contains the same element types as the HTML, the translation will be
very simple.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: HTML != XML (was Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt)
    • From: "Eddie Sheffield" <eddie.sheffield@e...>

• References:
  • [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt
    • From: Andrew Bunner <bunner@m...>
  • Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: (Fwd) Re: Proposal to XML-DEV: Collaborative XML
• Next by Date: Shocking News: Namespaces and Non-Validation
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
• Next by thread: Re: HTML != XML (was Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread