• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:10:48 -0400

James Clark wrote:

> The term "well-formed HTML" as used in section 1 of the XSL WD does not
> mean SGML that conforms to HTML 4.0. It means well-formed XML that uses
> element types and attributes from HTML.

Well and good.  But "uses element types" etc. is vague: all element
types, or only some of them?  It can't (straightforwardly) be all
of them, because SCRIPT and STYLE are CDATA elements, and so
have no XML equivalents.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
    • From: Toby Speight <tms@a...>

• References:
  • Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>
  • [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for xt
    • From: Andrew Bunner <bunner@m...>
  • Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
    • From: Andy Dent <dent@h...>
  • Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Summary of Namespaces and Validation
• Next by Date: RE: DTD vs Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread