• From: Mark Tucker <mct@f...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 09:15:48 -0500 (EST)

Where is the proper forum to discuss Schemas?

	DCD		-- ?
	XSchema		-- here
	RDF Schemas	-- ?

	RDF in general	-- ?	


Replacing DTD's sure looks like it would a Big Deal.

And I wonder along with "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

rg> If that happens, one has to wonder whether a fundamental redesign is
rg> in order.  I.e., if DTDs, SGML, etc. go out the window, why not just
rg> go back to the drawing board?  There's a lot of cruft that only made
rg> it into the XML standard because of SGML compatibility requirements.

==============================================================
Mark Tucker			tucker_m@r...
Regenstrief Institute		phone: (317) 630-2606
1001 W. 10'th St; Indianapolis, IN; 46202-2859;	fax: (317) 630-6962
	


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Where are discussions about Schemas taking place?
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
• Previous by thread: DTD vs Schema
• Next by thread: Re: Where are discussions about Schemas taking place?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread