• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Samuel R. Blackburn" <sblackbu@e...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 07:27:30 -0700

At 07:33 AM 9/30/98 -0400, Samuel R. Blackburn wrote:
>It seems to me that one of the first problems programmers
>encounter is XML's inability to handle "binary" data....
>If we could turn back the clock to before 19980210 and get
>rid of design goal #3, handling binary data could have been
>so easily handled by adding one element attribute. If the
>XML spec had included one predefined attribute called
>"xml:length" binary data would have been a no-brainer to
>handle. Here's an example:

It seems to me that using base64 handles this in a much
more robust and forgiving way.

>Will XML 2.0 handle binary data? Is XML 2.0 on the drawing
>boards yet?

No and no. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
• Next by Date: RE: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
• Previous by thread: RE: Binary Data in XML : Turning back the clock
• Next by thread: Re: Binary Data in XML : Turning back the clock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread