• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan@t...>
• To: Mark Tucker <mct@f...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 16:37:55 -0400

At 02:53 PM 9/10/98 -0500, Mark Tucker wrote:
>
>Wait, People, 
>
>	DO YOU OR DONT YOU BUY TIM BRAY'S ALGORITHM for
>	DTD validation in the face of Namespaces:

Sure. As long as you handle the prefixes in both the document and the dtd
before validation, it works. In other words, the five step algorithm works,
but it implies a little more than this short summary statement:
	
>	    "Re-write the document instance with consistent Prefixes
>	     then do a normal DTD validatation."

I also disagree somewhat with the following:

>	I don't see anything kludgy in it. (modulo my preference to
>        use expanded names directly in the processor's symbol table.)

Well, it's the least kludgy hack we have available to us until schemas can
handle namespace mapping. It's the way I would handle it in my applications.

Jonathan
 
jonathan@t...
Texcel Research
http://www.texcel.no

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Do you or Dont you buy Tim Bray's Namespace Validation Algorithm?
    • From: Mark Tucker <mct@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: namespaces discussion
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape
• Previous by thread: Do you or Dont you buy Tim Bray's Namespace Validation Algorithm?
• Next by thread: Re: Do you or Dont you buy Tim Bray's Namespace Validation Algorithm?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread