• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: <david@m...>, "Jonathan A. Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:54:29 -0700

At 12:34 PM 9/30/98 -0400, david@m... wrote:
>Quite right.  Right now, XML 1.0 has notations for this purpose, as
>Eliot keeps reminding us; it would also be possible to invent a
>standard attribute like 'xml:content', for use whether or not an
>element's content was Base64-encoded:

Yeah, but NOTATIONs require the use of a validating processor, and
lots of non-validating apps would like to use base64.  Having said
that, I think that your proposed xml:content is more or less exactly
what NOTATION is for? -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Binary Data in XML : Turning back the clock
    • From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@d...>
  • RE: Binary Data in XML : Turning back the clock
    • From: <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSL: Why?
• Next by Date: Re: XSL: Why?
• Previous by thread: RE: Binary Data in XML : Turning back the clock
• Next by thread: RE: Binary Data in XML : Turning back the clock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread