Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay wrote: > I think this response is referring to SGML rather than XML. > There is no SGML declaration in XML. There is no normative > link between XML and SGML, and therefore no normative link > between XML Public Identifiers and SGML FPIs. Normative, no, but James Clark's SGML declaration (http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-sgml-xml-971215) has some standing, since it is referred to in the XML Rec. That says "FEATURES OTHER FORMAL NO". Nevertheless, most PublicIds in examples are FPIs. > ... public identifiers are a trick inherited from SGML that > are probably only useful to people who already have working > SGML software installed. Coming soon: an SAX EntityResolver that processes Socats. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
