• From: rbourret@d... (Ron Bourret)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:13:08 +0200

John Cowan wrote:
> Ron Bourret wrote:
> 
> > [1] XSchemaPI ::= '<?xschema' S XSchemaID S? '?>'
> 
> Why the funky lower case?  "XSchema" here as elsewhere.

I started with XSchema and then thought xschema was easier to type (says he who 
proposed mixed case element names).  I'll change it.

> Also, there can be S after the "<?".

Not true.  See production [16] in the XML spec.

> > [2] XSchemaID ::= 'xschema' Eq SystemLiteral
>
> Some provision needs to be made for a PubIdLiteral as well.

I wondered about this.  I'll change the xschema in [2] to SYSTEM and add a 
production for PUBLIC.  Two questions:

1) Are there any conventions in PIs for use/no use of equals signs?

2) Do we always require a system identifier or are the choices system / public / 
both?

-- Ron

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSchema: Sections 5.0 and 5.1
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: attributes
• Next by Date: Re: Reusing schema vocabularies
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema: Sections 5.0 and 5.1
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema: Sections 5.0 and 5.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread