Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Tim Bray wrote: > Right, I get it. The idea is, for the case where qualified names are > given in attribute *values* (or I imagine, element content), the > prefix map (or at least a qualified-name expansion function) needs to be > available to application programmers - which should not be an issue > for implementors since the machinery has to be there anyhow. -T. Except for the problem of scope: the expansion function needs to know with respect to which point in the document it is operating. (Which is not necessarily the same as the current point of parsing.) -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
